[1]
Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 35, 4 (July 1969), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
[2]
Beresford, P. 2007. User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions. Health & Social Care in the Community. 15, 4 (Feb. 2007), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00688.x.
[3]
BLACKSHER, E. et al. 2012. What Is Public Deliberation? Hastings Center Report. 42, 2 (Mar. 2012), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.26.
[4]
Brunton, G; Caird, J; Stokes, G; Stansfield, C; Kneale, D; Richardson, M ; and others 2015. Review 1: Community engagement for health via coalitions, collaborations and partnerships: A systematic review. EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
[5]
Burawoy, M. 2004. Public Sociologies: Contradictions, Dilemmas, and Possibilities. Social Forces. 82, 4 (June 2004), 1603–1618. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0064.
[6]
Byrne, A. et al. 2009. Participatory research and the voice‐centred relational method of data analysis: is it worth it? International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 12, 1 (Feb. 2009), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701606044.
[7]
Chalmers, I. et al. 2014. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet. 383, 9912 (Jan. 2014), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1.
[8]
Collins K, Ison R Dare we jump off Arnstein’s ladder? Social learning as a new policy paradigm.
[9]
Cook, W.K. 2008. Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 62, 8 (Aug. 2008), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.067645.
[10]
Cornwall, A. 1996. Towards participatory practice: Participatory rural appraisal (PAR) and the participatory process. Participatory research in health: issues and experiences. Zed. 94–107.
[11]
Cullen, A.E. et al. 2011. The Politics and Consequences of Including Stakeholders in International Development Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation. 32, 3 (Sept. 2011), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010396076.
[12]
Davies C, Wetherell MS and Barnett E 2006. Deliberation: towards an understanding of practice. Citizens at the centre: deliberative participation in healthcare decisions. Policy.
[13]
Frickel, S. et al. 2010. Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 35, 4 (July 2010), 444–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909345836.
[14]
Grand, Ann ; Holliman, Richard ; Collins, Trevor ; Adams, Anne 2016. ‘We muddle our way through’: shared and distributed expertise in digital engagement with research. Journal of Science Communication. Vol.15(4), (2016).
[15]
Hart, R.A. and UNICEF. International Child Development Centre 1992. Children’s participation: from tokenism to citizenship. UNICEF International Child Development Centre.
[16]
Heggenhougen, K. and Quah, S.R. 2008. International encyclopedia of public health. Elsevier/Academic Press.
[17]
Holliman, Richard et al 2015. An Open Research University. The Open University.
[18]
Hubbard, G. et al. 2007. A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Education and Counseling. 65, 1 (Jan. 2007), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.009.
[19]
Jan Wallcraft and Mary Nettle 2009. Chapter 1: History, context and language. Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Wiley-Blackwell.
[20]
Jones, N. and Villar, E. 2008. Situating children in international development policy: challenges involved in successful evidence-informed policy influencing. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 4, 1 (Jan. 2008), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426408783477891.
[21]
MARSHMAN, Z. et al. 2007. Seen but not heard: a systematic review of the place of the child in 21st-century dental research. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 17, 5 (Sept. 2007), 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00845.x.
[22]
Martin, G.P. 2008. ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness. 30, 1 (Jan. 2008), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x.
[23]
Moore, K. 2015. Powered by the People: Scientific Authority in Participatory Science. The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. University of Wisconsin Press. 299–323.
[24]
Moules, T. and O’Brien, N. 2012. Participation in perspective: reflections from research projects. Nurse Researcher. 19, 2 (Jan. 2012), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.01.19.2.17.c8904.
[25]
Murphy, M K ; Black, N A ; Lamping, D L ; Mckee, C M ; Sanderson, C F ; Askham, J ; Marteau, T 1998. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment. (1998).
[26]
Nind, M. 2014. What is inclusive research?. Bloomsbury.
[27]
Nowotny, H. et al. 2003. Introduction: `Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva. 41, 3 (2003), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250.
[28]
Oliver, S. et al. 2004. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technology Assessment. 8, 15 (Apr. 2004). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8150.
[29]
Oliver, S. 2008. Public and Consumer Participation in Policy and Research. International Encyclopedia of Public Health. Elsevier. 408–415.
[30]
Oliver, S. et al. 2015. Public involvement in research: making sense of the diversity. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 20, 1 (Jan. 2015), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819614551848.
[31]
Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A. & Barnes, C. 2003. Types and quality of knowledge in social care. Social Care Institute for Excellence.
[32]
Percy-Smith, B. 2006. ‘You think you know? ... You have no idea’: youth participation in health policy development. Health Education Research. 22, 6 (Aug. 2006), 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym032.
[33]
Review 3: Community engagement for health via coalitions, collaborations and partnerships (on-line social media and social networks) – a systematic review and metaanalysis: 2015. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3478.
[34]
Richardson, L. 2013. Putting the Research Boot on the Policymakers’ Foot: Can Participatory Approaches Change the Relationship between Policymakers and Evaluation? Social Policy & Administration. 47, 4 (Aug. 2013), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12031.
[35]
Rickinson M, Sebba J, Edwards A 2011. Ways of thinking about user engagement. Improving research through user engagement. Routledge.
[36]
Rifkin, S.B. et al. 2001. Partners in planning: information, participation and empowerment. Macmillan.
[37]
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. 2005. A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 30, 2 (Apr. 2005), 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724.
[38]
Staley, K. 2015. ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 1, 1 (Dec. 2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5.
[39]
Staley, K. and Doherty, C. 2016. It’s not evidence, it’s insight: bringing patients’ perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2, 1 (Dec. 2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0018-y.
[40]
Stewart, R. and Liabo, K. 2012. Involvement in research without compromising research quality. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 17, 4 (Oct. 2012), 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011086.
[41]
Telford, R. et al. 2004. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations. 7, 3 (Aug. 2004), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00278.x.
[42]
Warren, J. and Garthwaite, K. 2015. Whose side are we on and for whom do we write? Notes on issues and challenges facing those researching and evaluating public policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 11, 2 (May 2015), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426415X14314311257040.
[43]
Watermeyer, R. 2016. Public intellectuals vs. new public management: the defeat of public engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 41, 12 (Dec. 2016), 2271–2285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1034261.