1.
Heggenhougen K, Quah SR. International Encyclopedia of Public Health. Elsevier/Academic Press; 2008. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/referenceworks/9780123739605
2.
Oliver S. Public and Consumer Participation in Policy and Research. In: International Encyclopedia of Public Health. Elsevier; 2008:408-415. doi:10.1016/B978-012373960-5.00586-4
3.
Burawoy M. Public Sociologies: Contradictions, Dilemmas, and Possibilities. Social Forces. 2004;82(4):1603-1618. doi:10.1353/sof.2004.0064
4.
Rifkin SB, Pridmore P, Teaching Aids at Low Cost. Partners in Planning: Information, Participation and Empowerment. Macmillan; 2001.
5.
Warren J, Garthwaite K. Whose side are we on and for whom do we write? Notes on issues and challenges facing those researching and evaluating public policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 2015;11(2):225-237. doi:10.1332/174426415X14314311257040
6.
Jan Wallcraft and Mary Nettle. Chapter 1: History, context and language. In: Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research. Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743157
7.
Moore K. Powered by the People: Scientific Authority in Participatory Science. In: The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. University of Wisconsin Press; 2015:299-323. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4d5b1072-890a-e811-80cd-005056af4099
8.
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Introduction: `Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva. 2003;41(3):179-194. doi:10.1023/A:1025505528250
9.
Beresford P. User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2007;15(4):306-312. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00688.x
10.
Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1969;35(4):216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
11.
Collins K, Ison R. Dare we jump off Arnstein’s ladder? Social learning as a new policy paradigm. http://oro.open.ac.uk/8589/
12.
Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A. & Barnes, C. Types and quality of knowledge in social care. Published online 2003. https://www.scie-socialcareonline.org.uk/types-and-quality-of-knowledge-in-social-care/r/a11G00000017vBqIAI
13.
Cornwall A. Towards participatory practice: Participatory rural appraisal (PAR) and the participatory process. In: Participatory Research in Health: Issues and Experiences. Zed; 1996:94-107.
14.
Hart RA, UNICEF. International Child Development Centre. Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Vol no.4. UNICEF International Child Development Centre; 1992.
15.
Nind M. What Is Inclusive Research? Bloomsbury; 2014. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/what-is-inclusive-research/
16.
Frickel S, Gibbon S, Howard J, Kempner J, Ottinger G, Hess DJ. Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2010;35(4):444-473. doi:10.1177/0162243909345836
17.
Martin GP. ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2008;30(1):35-54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x
18.
Rickinson M, Sebba J, Edwards A. Ways of thinking about user engagement. In: Improving Research through User Engagement. Routledge; 2011. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=22b2337c-3700-e811-80cd-005056af4099
19.
Stewart R, Liabo K. Involvement in research without compromising research quality. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2012;17(4):248-251. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011086
20.
Rowe G, Frewer LJ. A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2005;30(2):251-290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724
21.
Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technology Assessment. 2004;8(15). doi:10.3310/hta8150
22.
Oliver S, Liabo K, Stewart R, Rees R. Public involvement in research: making sense of the diversity. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2015;20(1):45-51. doi:10.1177/1355819614551848
23.
Byrne A, Canavan J, Millar M. Participatory research and the voice‐centred relational method of data analysis: is it worth it? International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2009;12(1):67-77. doi:10.1080/13645570701606044
24.
Cook WK. Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2008;62(8):668-676. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.067645
25.
Cullen AE, Coryn CLS, Rugh J. The Politics and Consequences of Including Stakeholders in International Development Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation. 2011;32(3):345-361. doi:10.1177/1098214010396076
26.
Jones N, Villar E. Situating children in international development policy: challenges involved in successful evidence-informed policy influencing. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 2008;4(1):31-51. doi:10.1332/174426408783477891
27.
MARSHMAN Z, GIBSON BJ, OWENS J, et al. Seen but not heard: a systematic review of the place of the child in 21st-century dental research. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2007;17(5):320-327. doi:10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00845.x
28.
Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156-165. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1
29.
Davies C, Wetherell MS and Barnett E. Deliberation: towards an understanding of practice. In: Citizens at the Centre: Deliberative Participation in Healthcare Decisions. Policy; 2006. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9125595f-a9f7-e711-80cd-005056af4099
30.
BLACKSHER E, DIEBEL A, FOREST PG, GOOLD SD, ABELSON J. What Is Public Deliberation? Hastings Center Report. 2012;42(2):14-16. doi:10.1002/hast.26
31.
Staley K, Doherty C. It’s not evidence, it’s insight: bringing patients’ perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2016;2(1). doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0018-y
32.
Watermeyer R. Public intellectuals vs. new public management: the defeat of public engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2016;41(12):2271-2285. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1034261
33.
Percy-Smith B. ‘You think you know? ... You have no idea’: youth participation in health policy development. Health Education Research. 2006;22(6):879-894. doi:10.1093/her/cym032
34.
Staley K. ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2015;1(1). doi:10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5
35.
Richardson L. Putting the Research Boot on the Policymakers’ Foot: Can Participatory Approaches Change the Relationship between Policymakers and Evaluation? Social Policy & Administration. 2013;47(4):483-500. doi:10.1111/spol.12031
36.
Telford R, Boote JD, Cooper CL. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations. 2004;7(3):209-220. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00278.x
37.
Brunton, G; Caird, J; Stokes, G; Stansfield, C; Kneale, D; Richardson, M ; and others. Review 1: Community engagement for health via coalitions, collaborations and partnerships: A systematic review. Published online 2015. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng44/evidence/evidence-review-1-community-engagement-2015-brunton-pdf-2368403677
38.
Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E, McDonald C, Kearney N. A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Education and Counseling. 2007;65(1):21-33. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.009
39.
Moules T, O’Brien N. Participation in perspective: reflections from research projects. Nurse Researcher. 2012;19(2):17-22. doi:10.7748/nr2012.01.19.2.17.c8904
40.
Grand, Ann ; Holliman, Richard ; Collins, Trevor ; Adams, Anne. ‘We muddle our way through’: shared and distributed expertise in digital engagement with research. Journal of Science Communication. 2016;Vol.15(4). https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/04/JCOM_1504_2016_A05
41.
Murphy, M K ; Black, N A ; Lamping, D L ; Mckee, C M ; Sanderson, C F ; Askham, J ; Marteau, T. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment. Published online 1998. https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta2030/#/full-report
42.
Holliman, Richard et al. An Open Research University. Published online 2015. http://oro.open.ac.uk/44255/
43.
Stokes G, Richardson M, Brunton G, Khatwa M, Thomas J. Review 3: Community engagement for health via coalitions, collaborations and partnerships (on-line social media and social networks) – a systematic review and metaanalysis. 2015. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3478
