1.
Heggenhougen, K., Quah, S.R.: International encyclopedia of public health. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam (2008).
2.
Oliver, S.: Public and Consumer Participation in Policy and Research. In: International Encyclopedia of Public Health. pp. 408–415. Elsevier (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373960-5.00586-4.
3.
Burawoy, M.: Public Sociologies: Contradictions, Dilemmas, and Possibilities. Social Forces. 82, 1603–1618 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0064.
4.
Rifkin, S.B., Pridmore, P., Teaching Aids at Low Cost: Partners in planning: information, participation and empowerment. Macmillan, London (2001).
5.
Warren, J., Garthwaite, K.: Whose side are we on and for whom do we write? Notes on issues and challenges facing those researching and evaluating public policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 11, 225–237 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1332/174426415X14314311257040.
6.
Jan Wallcraft and Mary Nettle: Chapter 1: History, context and language. In: Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK (2009).
7.
Moore, K.: Powered by the People: Scientific Authority in Participatory Science. In: The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. pp. 299–323. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI (2015).
8.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M.: Introduction: `Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva. 41, 179–194 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250.
9.
Beresford, P.: User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions. Health & Social Care in the Community. 15, 306–312 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00688.x.
10.
Arnstein, S.R.: A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 35, 216–224 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
11.
Collins K, Ison R: Dare we jump off Arnstein’s ladder? Social learning as a new policy paradigm, http://oro.open.ac.uk/8589/.
12.
Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A. & Barnes, C.: Types and quality of knowledge in social care, https://www.scie-socialcareonline.org.uk/types-and-quality-of-knowledge-in-social-care/r/a11G00000017vBqIAI, (2003).
13.
Cornwall, A.: Towards participatory practice: Participatory rural appraisal (PAR) and the participatory process. In: Participatory research in health: issues and experiences. pp. 94–107. Zed, London (1996).
14.
Hart, R.A., UNICEF. International Child Development Centre: Children’s participation: from tokenism to citizenship. UNICEF International Child Development Centre, Florence (1992).
15.
Nind, M.: What is inclusive research? Bloomsbury, London (2014).
16.
Frickel, S., Gibbon, S., Howard, J., Kempner, J., Ottinger, G., Hess, D.J.: Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 35, 444–473 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909345836.
17.
Martin, G.P.: ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness. 30, 35–54 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x.
18.
Rickinson M, Sebba J, Edwards A: Ways of thinking about user engagement. In: Improving research through user engagement. Routledge, Abingdon (2011).
19.
Stewart, R., Liabo, K.: Involvement in research without compromising research quality. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 17, 248–251 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011086.
20.
Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J.: A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 30, 251–290 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724.
21.
Oliver, S., Clarke-Jones, L., Rees, R., Milne, R., Buchanan, P., Gabbay, J., Gyte, G., Oakley, A., Stein, K.: Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technology Assessment. 8, (2004). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8150.
22.
Oliver, S., Liabo, K., Stewart, R., Rees, R.: Public involvement in research: making sense of the diversity. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 20, 45–51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819614551848.
23.
Byrne, A., Canavan, J., Millar, M.: Participatory research and the voice‐centred relational method of data analysis: is it worth it? International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 12, 67–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701606044.
24.
Cook, W.K.: Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 62, 668–676 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.067645.
25.
Cullen, A.E., Coryn, C.L.S., Rugh, J.: The Politics and Consequences of Including Stakeholders in International Development Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation. 32, 345–361 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010396076.
26.
Jones, N., Villar, E.: Situating children in international development policy: challenges involved in successful evidence-informed policy influencing. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 4, 31–51 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1332/174426408783477891.
27.
MARSHMAN, Z., GIBSON, B.J., OWENS, J., RODD, H.D., MAZEY, H., BAKER, S.R., BENSON, P.E., ROBINSON, P.G.: Seen but not heard: a systematic review of the place of the child in 21st-century dental research. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 17, 320–327 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00845.x.
28.
Chalmers, I., Bracken, M.B., Djulbegovic, B., Garattini, S., Grant, J., Gülmezoglu, A.M., Howells, D.W., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Oliver, S.: How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet. 383, 156–165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1.
29.
Davies C, Wetherell MS and Barnett E: Deliberation: towards an understanding of practice. In: Citizens at the centre: deliberative participation in healthcare decisions. Policy, Bristol (2006).
30.
BLACKSHER, E., DIEBEL, A., FOREST, P.-G., GOOLD, S.D., ABELSON, J.: What Is Public Deliberation? Hastings Center Report. 42, 14–16 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.26.
31.
Staley, K., Doherty, C.: It’s not evidence, it’s insight: bringing patients’ perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0018-y.
32.
Watermeyer, R.: Public intellectuals vs. new public management: the defeat of public engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 41, 2271–2285 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1034261.
33.
Percy-Smith, B.: ‘You think you know? ... You have no idea’: youth participation in health policy development. Health Education Research. 22, 879–894 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym032.
34.
Staley, K.: ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 1, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5.
35.
Richardson, L.: Putting the Research Boot on the Policymakers’ Foot: Can Participatory Approaches Change the Relationship between Policymakers and Evaluation? Social Policy & Administration. 47, 483–500 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12031.
36.
Telford, R., Boote, J.D., Cooper, C.L.: What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations. 7, 209–220 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00278.x.
37.
Brunton, G; Caird, J; Stokes, G; Stansfield, C; Kneale, D; Richardson, M ; and others: Review 1: Community engagement for health via coalitions, collaborations and partnerships: A systematic review, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng44/evidence/evidence-review-1-community-engagement-2015-brunton-pdf-2368403677, (2015).
38.
Hubbard, G., Kidd, L., Donaghy, E., McDonald, C., Kearney, N.: A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Education and Counseling. 65, 21–33 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.009.
39.
Moules, T., O’Brien, N.: Participation in perspective: reflections from research projects. Nurse Researcher. 19, 17–22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.01.19.2.17.c8904.
40.
Grand, Ann ; Holliman, Richard ; Collins, Trevor ; Adams, Anne: ‘We muddle our way through’: shared and distributed expertise in digital engagement with research. Journal of Science Communication. Vol.15(4), (2016).
41.
Murphy, M K ; Black, N A ; Lamping, D L ; Mckee, C M ; Sanderson, C F ; Askham, J ; Marteau, T: Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment. (1998).
42.
Holliman, Richard et al: An Open Research University, http://oro.open.ac.uk/44255/, (2015).
43.
Stokes G, Richardson M, Brunton G, Khatwa M, Thomas J: Review 3: Community engagement for health via coalitions, collaborations and partnerships (on-line social media and social networks) – a systematic review and metaanalysis, https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3478.