1
Heggenhougen K, Quah SR. International encyclopedia of public health. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press 2008.
2
Oliver S. Public and Consumer Participation in Policy and Research. International Encyclopedia of Public Health. Elsevier 2008:408–15.
3
Burawoy M. Public Sociologies: Contradictions, Dilemmas, and Possibilities. Social Forces. 2004;82:1603–18. doi: 10.1353/sof.2004.0064
4
Rifkin SB, Pridmore P, Teaching Aids at Low Cost. Partners in planning: information, participation and empowerment. London: Macmillan 2001.
5
Warren J, Garthwaite K. Whose side are we on and for whom do we write? Notes on issues and challenges facing those researching and evaluating public policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 2015;11:225–37. doi: 10.1332/174426415X14314311257040
6
Jan Wallcraft and Mary Nettle. Chapter 1: History, context and language. Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell 2009.
7
Moore K. Powered by the People: Scientific Authority in Participatory Science. The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press 2015:299–323.
8
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Introduction: `Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva. 2003;41:179–94. doi: 10.1023/A:1025505528250
9
Beresford P. User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2007;15:306–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00688.x
10
Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1969;35:216–24. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
11
Collins K, Ison R. Dare we jump off Arnstein’s ladder? Social learning as a new policy paradigm.
12
Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A. & Barnes, C. Types and quality of knowledge in social care. 2003.
13
Cornwall A. Towards participatory practice: Participatory rural appraisal (PAR) and the participatory process. Participatory research in health: issues and experiences. London: Zed 1996:94–107.
14
Hart RA, UNICEF. International Child Development Centre. Children’s participation: from tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF International Child Development Centre 1992.
15
Nind M. What is inclusive research? London: Bloomsbury 2014.
16
Frickel S, Gibbon S, Howard J, et al. Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2010;35:444–73. doi: 10.1177/0162243909345836
17
Martin GP. ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2008;30:35–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x
18
Rickinson M, Sebba J, Edwards A. Ways of thinking about user engagement. Improving research through user engagement. Abingdon: Routledge 2011.
19
Stewart R, Liabo K. Involvement in research without compromising research quality. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2012;17:248–51. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011086
20
Rowe G, Frewer LJ. A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2005;30:251–90. doi: 10.1177/0162243904271724
21
Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technology Assessment. 2004;8. doi: 10.3310/hta8150
22
Oliver S, Liabo K, Stewart R, et al. Public involvement in research: making sense of the diversity. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2015;20:45–51. doi: 10.1177/1355819614551848
23
Byrne A, Canavan J, Millar M. Participatory research and the voice‐centred relational method of data analysis: is it worth it? International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2009;12:67–77. doi: 10.1080/13645570701606044
24
Cook WK. Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2008;62:668–76. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.067645
25
Cullen AE, Coryn CLS, Rugh J. The Politics and Consequences of Including Stakeholders in International Development Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation. 2011;32:345–61. doi: 10.1177/1098214010396076
26
Jones N, Villar E. Situating children in international development policy: challenges involved in successful evidence-informed policy influencing. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 2008;4:31–51. doi: 10.1332/174426408783477891
27
MARSHMAN Z, GIBSON BJ, OWENS J, et al. Seen but not heard: a systematic review of the place of the child in 21st-century dental research. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2007;17:320–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00845.x
28
Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet. 2014;383:156–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1
29
Davies C, Wetherell MS and Barnett E. Deliberation: towards an understanding of practice. Citizens at the centre: deliberative participation in healthcare decisions. Bristol: Policy 2006.
30
BLACKSHER E, DIEBEL A, FOREST P-G, et al. What Is Public Deliberation? Hastings Center Report. 2012;42:14–6. doi: 10.1002/hast.26
31
Staley K, Doherty C. It’s not evidence, it’s insight: bringing patients’ perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2016;2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0018-y
32
Watermeyer R. Public intellectuals vs. new public management: the defeat of public engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2016;41:2271–85. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1034261
33
Percy-Smith B. ‘You think you know? ... You have no idea’: youth participation in health policy development. Health Education Research. 2006;22:879–94. doi: 10.1093/her/cym032
34
Staley K. ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2015;1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5
35
Richardson L. Putting the Research Boot on the Policymakers’ Foot: Can Participatory Approaches Change the Relationship between Policymakers and Evaluation? Social Policy & Administration. 2013;47:483–500. doi: 10.1111/spol.12031
36
Telford R, Boote JD, Cooper CL. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations. 2004;7:209–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00278.x
37
Brunton, G; Caird, J; Stokes, G; Stansfield, C; Kneale, D; Richardson, M ; and others. Review 1: Community engagement for health via coalitions, collaborations and partnerships: A systematic review. 2015.
38
Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E, et al. A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Education and Counseling. 2007;65:21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.009
39
Moules T, O’Brien N. Participation in perspective: reflections from research projects. Nurse Researcher. 2012;19:17–22. doi: 10.7748/nr2012.01.19.2.17.c8904
40
Grand, Ann ; Holliman, Richard ; Collins, Trevor ; Adams, Anne. ‘We muddle our way through’: shared and distributed expertise in digital engagement with research. Journal of Science Communication. 2016;Vol.15(4).
41
Murphy, M K ; Black, N A ; Lamping, D L ; Mckee, C M ; Sanderson, C F ; Askham, J ; Marteau, T. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment. Published Online First: 1998.
42
Holliman, Richard et al. An Open Research University. 2015.
43
Stokes G, Richardson M, Brunton G, Khatwa M, Thomas J. Review 3: Community engagement for health via coalitions, collaborations and partnerships (on-line social media and social networks) – a systematic review and metaanalysis. 2015. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3478